As we honor the legacy of Dr. King, let’s focus on equity, and character, in education

In 1947, as an 18 year-old student at Atlanta Baptist College (now Morehouse College) in his hometown of Atlanta, Martin Luther King, Jr. penned an essay for The Maroon Tiger, his student newspaper (and later mine, many years later).

He would go on to lament the fact that even degreed individuals were not able to think for themselves, “sift and weigh evidence, to discern the true from the false” and think critically.

When I first read Dr. King’s essay, I was simultaneously amused and saddened that today’s debate about the purpose of education is over the same questions Dr. King was debating in 1947. We’re still trying to figure out whether education, specifically higher education, is to produce workers or thinkers. We’re still seeing, as California Community Colleges Chancellor Eloy Ortiz Oakley has so eloquently said, a climate in which men with degrees sit around and pontificate over who needs one.

Our very system of education is used as an instrument of exploitation to enable people to “forever trample over the masses.” We continue to maintain a system of education which creates one class of workers and a separate class of thinkers. We continue to fund schools unequally and provide unequal resources. We subject children in places like Baltimore to schools with broken heating on frigid days and no air conditioning on record heat days, and not to mention higher teacher turnover and fewer advanced courses and question why these students are unable to learn.

Dr. King closed out, saying:

When we talk about character and discipline and grit in schools, we tend to only talk about the need to instill these traits in low-income students and students of color, whom society tends to paint as lawless and needing saving from themselves. We usually assume that students who come from better-off and white families have some innate sense of morality.

But since poor children and children of color are not usually the ones who grow to hold all the power, perhaps it is not their lack of morality which is damning the country.

Maybe, then, the conversations about character with intelligence should be trained to all students, without perpetuating this notion that has been popular in our society that some people are inherently good and moral and some are inherental unscrupulous and amoral, and that these traits are determined by race and class. And maybe we should stop having conversations about what is best for a particular group of students without including those students, and others who have had similar experiences, at the conversation table.

--

--

Autumn A. Arnett is an advocate for education equity, an HBCU alumna, Founder of A Black Child Can (aBlackChildCan.org). Connect with her via www.a2arnett.com.

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Autumn A. Arnett

Autumn A. Arnett is an advocate for education equity, an HBCU alumna, Founder of A Black Child Can (aBlackChildCan.org). Connect with her via www.a2arnett.com.